Lex Machina, a LexisNexis company and creator of the award-winning Legal Analytics® platform, today released findings from its fourth annual Patent Litigation Year in Review report.
The report examines key 2016 patent litigation trends and provides insights gleaned from quantitative data about federal district court cases, PTAB trials and ITC investigations. Lex Machina executives will review the findings in a live webcast today.
“We found some interesting and surprising results in this year’s data, including a fairly dramatic decline in case filings across many of the top districts,” said Owen Byrd, chief evangelist and general counsel of Lex Machina. “While it’s too soon to tell whether the decline represents a sea change or a one-year anomaly, we will certainly be keeping a close eye on filing numbers in the year to come.”
The Patent Litigation Year in Review report analyzes filing trends, key decisions and timing to key events, as well as settlement rates, damages and other data. It shows top districts by case filings, top plaintiffs and defendants and their law firms, top parties winning damages and median awards of damages by district courts. It also reveals relationships between findings (of infringement or in favor of defenses like fair use) and judgment types (e.g., default judgment, summary judgment or trial). This year’s report adds in two special sections: a review of the Eastern District of Texas, as well as a party profile of the leading plaintiff in 2016.
Among the report’s key findings:
“Each year when we present patent litigation findings, the data reveal new insights and sometimes unexpected results,” said Brian Howard, Legal Data Scientist and author of the report. “That’s why the ability to track industry trends based on hard data is essential for patent litigators and executives, who would otherwise have to rely on anecdotal evidence and make key business and strategic decisions without having all the facts at their disposal.”
The report data was compiled using Lex Machina’s award-winning Legal Analytics® platform, which is used by many of the top IP law firms in the U.S., as well as major corporations such as Microsoft, IBM, Nike and eBay. Armed with the report, patent attorneys can make better strategic decisions related to forum planning, based on detailed analyses of districts and judges. They can also make sound budgeting decisions using historical data about the timing of trials and injunctions, and identify top parties and firms to inform marketing strategies and outside counsel selection.
Copyright © 2018 Legal IT Professionals. All Rights Reserved.